OK with me. Nupef can endorse the letter too.
--c.a.
On 09/09/2014 10:20 PM, Norbert Klein wrote:
> Supporting.
>
> Norbert Klein
>
> =
>
> On 9/9/2014 5:50 PM, Maria Farrell wrote:
>> We seem to have a very good level of support for this.
>>
>> As PC co-chair, here's my official request: are there any OBJECTIONS
>> to us signing this as the NCSG?
>>
>> Please let me know by replying to this email within the next 24 hours.
>>
>> All the best, Maria
>>
>> On 6 September 2014 01:31, Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for NCSG
>>
>> > Em 06/09/2014, às 03:13, Clarinettet <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> escreveu:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPad
>> >
>> >> On 6 Sep 2014, at 00:17, Fouad Bajwa <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I believe this is right on the spot! +1 from my side!
>> >>
>> >> Best
>> >>
>> >> Fouad
>> >>
>> >>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Rafik Dammak
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> >>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> 2 members of NCSG worked on letter to be signed by the different
>> >>> stakeholders about the renewal of IGF. I think that is an
>> effort we can
>> >>> support and a letter we can sign. the time-window to act is
>> quite short and
>> >>> I would like to know if there is support for this letter and
>> if we can sign
>> >>> it as NCSG.
>> >>> I think several members from NCSG already expressed support in
>> other spaces
>> >>> regarding this letter.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>>
>> >>> Rafik
>> >>> ..................
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear colleagues and fellow stakeholders of the Internet
>> Governance Forum:
>> >>>
>> >>> At the 9th meeting of the Internet Governance Forum, various
>> >>> stakeholders discussed their common desire to request an
>> immediate
>> >>> extension of the IGF mandate, in order to create stabiity for the
>> >>> organization and predictability for those engaged in seeking
>> funding for
>> >>> projects. We have drafted a statement to send to the UN, to
>> request not
>> >>> just an immediate renewal of the IGF mandate, but rather an
>> open-ended
>> >>> re-authorization of the IGF as a voluntary, multistakeholder
>> forum. We
>> >>> request that other participants in the IGF also support this
>> message on
>> >>> or before November 1.
>> >>>
>> >>> We will be creating a neutral website for this project at
>> >>> www.IGFcontinuity.org <http://www.IGFcontinuity.org> very
>> shortly, to accept sign-ons of organizations,
>> >>> countries, and individuals. In the meantime, the undersigned
>> will
>> >>> collect your signatures and description of your organization
>> if you are
>> >>> able to endorse this letter by the time of the closing
>> ceremony at IGF
>> >>> 2014. The deadline to be included in the letter presented via
>> the Chair
>> >>> will be 11am UTC, Friday September 5.
>> >>> Examples of how you will be listed appear below:
>> >>> 1. Jane Smith Individual
>> >>> 2. Acme Industry Association Association representing 150
>> >>> manuacturers of widgets
>> >>> 3. State of [x] Country
>> >>>
>> >>> Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions.
>> >>>
>> >>> Jeanette Hofmann, Berlin Social Science Center,
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> >>> Stephanie Perrin, Non-commercial Stakeholders Group, ICANN,
>> >>> [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Regards.
>> >> --------------------------
>> >> Fouad Bajwa
>> >> ICT4D and Internet Governance Advisor
>> >> My Blog: Internet's Governance:
>> http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/
>> >> Follow my Tweets: http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
>>
>>
>
|
