-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Same goes for me. I am a representative of the NCSG in the Council and
I try to make sure that my NCSG membership is what is listed in every
WG or whatever I participate in.

More than that I consider myself a member of NCSG first.  I join the
NCUC while the NCSG was in formation and as the chair of the NCSG
executive committee throughout that reorganization process formed a
very strong allegiance to the NCSG and its charter.

I also belong to the NCUC since that is the only group there was to
join when I joined.  I am fond of the NCUC and support many of its
goals in so far as I think they are consistent with NCSG goals.  I
definitely caucus with the NCUC on many issues.

Coincidentally I am also a member of the zombie candidate Consumer
Constituency.

avri


On 23-Sep-14 14:51, David Cake wrote:
> I also consider myself an NCSG councillor, though my organisation
> is a member of NCUC and not a member of NPOC.
> 
> There are some issues I may discuss mostly with NCUC colleagues,
> but as far as I am concerned all council votes are discussed with
> NCSG. And when I am acting as Vice-Chair, I act on behalf of the
> entire council, and the NCPH in particular when it is relevant
> (which is seldom).
> 
> Regards
> 
> David
> 
> On 24 Sep 2014, at 12:41 am, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Seun,
> 
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Seun Ojedeji
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Rafik,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Rafik Dammak 
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Hi Seun,
> 
> 
> if you check the NCSG committees such as the  executive and policy 
> committees , they includes 2 representatives from each
> constituency who should liaise with their groups and bring their
> inputs. while the NCSG membership also give the policy committee
> input directly like when we have a public statement under
> consultation.
> 
> I get the point...i also hope that the GNSO councillors are either 
> NPOC or NCUC member as it looks like one can sign-up to NCSG and
> not necessarily be part of NPOC/NCUC which IMO defeats the purpose
> of having constituencies
> 
> The six NCSG representatives to the GNSO council also serve on the 
> NCSG PC. So does the NCSG Chair, which along with the 4 reps from
> the existing 2 constituencies makes 11 in total.
> 
> A drawback to your proposal of having the GNSO councillors being 
> strictly affiliated with constituencies is that it would hinder
> their (our) ability to represent members of those who do not belong
> to the constituency we belong to on the GNSO council.
> 
> I am a member of NCSG as well as NCUC. However, I was elected to 
> council by NCSG members; which to me means that I represent the 
> members of NCSG regardless of their constituency memberships or
> lack of. When I participate in discussions about gTLD policy, I
> don’t do so on the NCUC list. I send my comments to the NCSG. When
> I discuss issues on the council list or during council meetings, I
> try to represent all the NCSG membership, not those limited to a
> single constituency.
> 
> I hope that helps.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUIcTyAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HXLgIAIn9GVbiNhezwiNj3RVVZmXe
bW45kinr2nvlqRXh0KHz+bLI+PwAMknMrA0g8VxO+ox8arvEu1wSZJ27ivIpo9dU
XPOFCq9XDAikB5bW69FHqsxunQlKRbCAvQ9o8N486KYD250WLv2FPG/hPwHBwOFF
CYjDzHnh+gIHlhGG+hjQ5d9F0O5J2URKTJNV5eYtdb+1SN+2cUIFB2prbEJWBxRy
3ca7Dh99SLu29XbN8SfNzZc5Pui2G9bhnLB/7LRxF570rTY7GNCgpEkJA/5VveSZ
aFidkeULEjmOKIcABFjbjbZ2cj6k6+fib9hfqsIDvZ/BACu2oBUxykbaqKOfrtk=
=OQ+5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----