Hi Joy

On May 12, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Joy Liddicoat wrote:

> Hi all - passing this on - any suggestions would be welcome (though needed
> quickly) .Ideas I have already suggested include: 
> how the GAC and GNSO can improve the joint working relationship? Are our
> processes for joint engagement on areas of mutual interest adequate - can
> they be improved? For example, would an informal joint standing committee of
> some kind be helpful? This could also be a topic for the GNO Council working
> session.

We've talked about this with the GAC before, and it mostly ended up with them telling us about all the reasons why they can't really engage much in joint working relationships with GNSO and prefer to deal with the board.  But we could try again in light of subsequent experience…Or, how about asking them how they will go about ensuring a balance between all the law enforcement stuff they want and privacy and FoE?  Other SGs might not be enthused, but then again often there's a dearth of suggestions…

BD

> For the ccNSO - discussion on how we can engage around areas of mutual
> interest such as developing policies for law enforcement requests 
> Cheers
> 
> Joy 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Friday, 11 May 2012 8:06 p.m.
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] Prague - please read!
> 
> 
> Councillors,
> 
> I would like to strongly request your help in coming up with two things in
> preparation for our Prague week:
> 
> 1. Topics for our interactions with the Board/GAC and ccNSO and 2. Ideas for
> sessions for our work weekend.
> 
> As added context, I should say that the Council leadership is under greater
> pressure than usual to provide this earlier than usual (Staff have been put
> under pressure due to the delay in publishing the CR agenda that people
> complained about there).
> 
> I should also add that I have asked Jeff, who has kindly volunteered (or was
> kindly volunteered by me, whichever way you want to see it ;) ) to look
> after our Prague agenda, to ensure that we cut down on pure working lunch
> sessions. I find these sessions are an organizational nightmare as people
> need time to have their lunch, which cost down on the time afforded to the
> topic we are scheduled to work on.
> 
> So in short, please make a greater effort than usual to provide ideas for 1
> and 2 above. These sessions, both our interactions with other groups and our
> own working sessions, should be the result of Council-wide deliberations so
> that they are truly effective and have greater meaning for the Council as a
> whole.
> 
> Thanks for your help in this endeavor.
> 
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM Group NBT France
> ----------------
> Head of Domain Operations
> Group NBT