Seems an idea worth considering.

avri

On 20 Dec 2012, at 17:31, Robin Gross wrote:

> Perhaps NCSG should make an official public statement to express our concern regarding the mis-handling of this issue by the GNSO Council (and possibly staff due to their shepherding of the motion through regardless of proper process)?  I think we need to draw attention to these problems where councilors are creating such privileges for their own clients with their council votes and also resubmitting a rejected motion without dealing with the conflict of interest causing the problem in the first place.
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
>> On 20 Dec 2012, at 14:22, joy wrote:
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Thanks all for the comments. The matter was referred to the SCI today,
>>> following the Council meeting.
>>> Joy
>> 
>> 
>> It may have been referred to the SCI,
>> but that is a case too late.
>> 
>> the motion that both staff and the chair wanted passed was rammed through.
>> in my opinion this was illegitimate.
>> and should have waited on the recommendation of the SCI.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]
> 
> 
>