Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:34:25 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree...we have to get the documents in on time. Milton sent this
around at least two weeks ago now...in hindsight, we (the policy cttee)
should have set a deadline and said all comments in by x, it goes out x
plus two days.
cheers SP
On 2015-02-26 9:50, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Milton,
>
> I would suggest that NCSG not only give some members "the pen" to work
> on documents, but assign "a gavel" to one member who can first warn of
> deadlines, and then pound the gavel and say "document closed and sent".
> Many of the nuances that are important don't really get carved in
> stone when documents are tabled and get struggled with in the ongoing
> processes. It is better to submit a more-or-less consensus document
> with a few warts to be struggled over later, than to submit no
> document at all.
>
> Sam L.
>
> On 26/02/2015 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> Well, the CWG meeting discussing the surveys was this morning. Early.
>> I wasn't able to attend, so maybe someone else can tell us whether we
>> missed the boat.
>> Probably so. This is very frustrating.
|
|
|