Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:32:36 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear all
I agree with Tapani. We have to go with the due process as described by
Tapani, I think nobody is happy with that but that is what we have to do
if we want to stay legal.
Yours
Klaus
On 8/23/2016 2:19 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 03:56:45PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
>> If the appeal is not resolved, the entire election will be thrown out
> That is not true. The appeal will of course be resolved one way or
> another, but invalidating the election would need a new, separate
> process.
>
> Likewise, this will inevitably lead to the establishment of proper,
> well-defined procedures for next election, possibly also charter
> reform.
>
> And that is good.
>
> But as it is, election is ongoing.
>
> Some people would like to change the ballot mid-election.
>
> An appeal has been filed and will be processed in due course as
> described in our charter.
>
> But that is no reason to stop the election now.
>
> Just vote.
>
|
|
|