NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:05:13 -0500
Reply-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
I would support PC endorsement of the letters submitted by colleagues.  Looks like there are quite a few from NC.

Am I right that Mary is still the chair of the PC?  Madame Wong, would you have any bandwidth for this?

So who will be on the DT call when Jeff tries to pretend that all the comments are off point etc?

Bill

On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> While I have already filed comments on 2 topics, I plan to file comments on 2 more topics.  Hope I get to it in time.
> 
> Is the NCSG PC filing anything.
> 
> If nothing else, perhaps the NCSG-PC or NCUC-PC can endorse  some of the various comments that have been submitted by the SG/C members.
> 
> Of course if we expect any of these comments to make a single bit of difference in the report from this DT or in the vote of the GNSO council, we are deluding ourselves.  The only chance is that the comments be properly included in the report to the Board and that someone on the hope that someone on Board will actually read them and be able to make a considered decision.
> 
> As i said in my comment at the microphone, in one thing I agree with Jeff - this event will be a milestone in the GNSO's demise.  I disagree with him about the cause, it is  not because we delayed doing the GAC's bidding to allow for 1/2 of a proper comment process, but because we are tripping over ourselves to do the wrong thing.  In all my years of GNSO participation and past leadership, I have never been so disappointed in the organization or its leadership.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 20 Mar 2012, at 22:31, Joy Liddicoat wrote:
> 
>> Hi – just passing on this request from the Chair of the IOC/RC Drafting Team.
>> There is another meeting of this group tomorrow which I can attend for a short time.
>> If you have any comments please advise or if you are intending to post public comments but have not yet done so, please note the close out date is 23 March.
>> Thanks
>> Joy
>> 
>> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 2:10 p.m.
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Preparation for Tomorrow's Call
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Please make sure you review the comments already filed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/ioc-rcrc-proposal/ so we are prepared to have a discussion on thee tomorrow.    
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
>> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / [log in to unmask]  / www.neustar.biz
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2