NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:38:40 +0000
Reply-To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: .COM renewal and thick Whois
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Sorry, that should be "thin" whois not "think" whois. ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 12:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] .COM renewal and thick Whois
> 
> Just read the GNSO Council meeting agenda for April 12.
> Is the .COM renewal being used as an excuse to force or pressure the last
> redoubt of think Whois into thick Whois?
> If so, what can we do about it?
> 
> Milton L. Mueller
> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> Internet Governance Project
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2