BTW, I requested consideration of vote normalization.

While I do not think there needs to be provisions for voting by the
CCWG, if there are, I believe they need to be normalized.  I prefer
rough consensus.

My tendency at this point is to vote against this charter for that reason.

avri


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: Cross Community Working Group
on Internet Governance proposed Charter
Date: 	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:33:12 +0200
From: 	Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <[log in to unmask]>
To: 	[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>



Dear all,

FYI, I have sent the charter V5 to SO/AC Chairs. With no consensus on
normalisation of votes and an earlier discussion between SO & AC chairs
about normalisation of votes not being the standard at the moment at
ICANN -- in fact there is no standard.
Kind regards,

Olivier


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance proposed
Charter
Date: 	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:14:35 +0200
From: 	Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <[log in to unmask]>
To: 	[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>, Ergys Ramaj
<[log in to unmask]>
CC: 	Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>, 'Bart Boswinkel'
<[log in to unmask]>, Renate DeWulf <[log in to unmask]>,
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <[log in to unmask]>



Dear SO/AC Chairs,

please be so kind to find the proposed draft charter of the Cross
Community Working Group on Internet Governance attached to this message.

The working group asks that this draft charter be considered by your
Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees for the official
creation of the CCWG. As a reminder, this is a follow-up to the work
that was cast aside whilst input to the NetMundial meeting was needed at
short notice.


The draft Charter is the result of discussion held in Singapore
regarding the future of the working group as well as a Team of
individuals from several SOs and AC drawing on their combined experience
in drafting charters.

It is hoped that the issue of chartering this WG can be added to the
agenda of all SOs and ACs that will meet in London and that the WG will
receive your feedback by the end of the ICANN meeting, on 26 June 2014.

Of particular importance you might with to look at the votes and the
(lack of) normalisation on a per SO/AC basis. The charter drafting team
could not reach consensus on whether normalisation of votes was needed
or not. We leave it to your community to provide its feedback on preference.

For any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Rafik Dammak or
myself, the current interim coordinators of the WG.
Kind regards,

Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
CCWG on Internet Governance Coordinator








_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
[log in to unmask]
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance