Perfect! 

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> I tried to synthesize what was said and came up with the following (ok, I
> added some of my own content too). I have sent them to Diane with an
> apology for being a day late.  Thanks to those who commented.
> 
> 1. We would like to better understand how the Board weighs GAC advice in
> relation to  GNSO recommendations, the CWG work and community
> comment on the implementation in the by-laws mandated process.  Of
> special interest are issues related to MAPO/Rec6 and Community Objections.
> 
> 2.  We would be very interested to hear how the the Board reads both the
> substance and process of Cross-Community WGs and the JAS group in
> particular to understand what the Board is  thinking viable supports might be
> and how they regard the recommendations for fee reductions.
> 
> 3. While understanding that the NCSG Stakeholder Group charter is waiting
> on the approval of the standardized New  Constituency process
> recommended by the Structural Improvements Committee, we would like to
> understand what issues, if any, may be blocking Board approval of both the
> New Constituency Process and the NCSG Stakeholder Group charter.
> 
> a.