NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:52:09 +0100
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (139 lines)
Hi,

Perhaps '+1' seems a bit more curt to those who have not being using
this shorthand for a long time.*

One of the reasons though for announcing/collecting nominations on the
full NCSG DISCUSS list even though it is the Policy Committee that is
charter to make the decision is to give the NCSG memberships a chance to
express their views so the PC voters can take those opinions into
account when making the decision.

avri

* I don't personally use it too often as I rarely agree with everything
someone else as said, and +1 is rather strong endorsement of someone
else's opinion.


On 26-Jun-14 04:13, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> There are times for +1s, and there are times where it is in the interest
> of discussion and/or civility and/or democratic process to resist the
> urge to +1.
> 
> I wish more would have stayed their fingers ... . I like Milton. From
> what I can see I like Sam too. This is an important job. It will require
> many things, and then more, and then dedication. I am grateful for all
> those who would even consider doing it.
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> On 2014-06-25 9:38 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have not been running a ballot yet.  People have been giving their
>> support to the candidate of their choice. It is the way this list, and
>> many civil society lists have run for at least the years of my
>> experience.  A ballot is something formal by the PC as the charter
>> states.  I am surprised that Sam dropped out.  I did not see acrimony.
>> Nor did I intend any. Though I did intend to be firm in my resolve and
>> direct in the expression of that resolve.
>>
>> And I invited Sam or his nominators to give his credentials and explain
>> why he was the best and what he had done in ICANN to show that.
>>
>> What I was unwilling to see done, was have the election rules changed.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25-Jun-14 23:46, Lori Schulman wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>>  
>>> I am sorry to see Sam withdraw and, I too, ,was operating under the
>>> impression that the process would be a true selection process based on
>>> the evaluation of candidates against our stated criteria.  There is no
>>> doubt about Milton’s qualifications but I would have liked to see a
>>> different process too so that others who may be qualified would be
>>> considered.   As to Avri’s point, I agree that this is about NCSG and
>>> not constituencies but it also should be about fairness and I didn’t
>>> even see the email that said we were running a ballot today.
>>>
>>>  
>>> Lori
>>>
>>>  
>>>  
>>> *Lori S. Schulman*· General Counsel
>>> 1703 North Beauregard Street
>>>
>>> Alexandria, VA  22311-1714
>>>
>>> P 703-575-5678 · [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>> Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0
>>>
>>>  
>>>  
>>> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of
>>> *Sam Lanfranco
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:38 PM
>>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>>> *Subject:* Re: Selection of NCSG representative/connector on IANA
>>> Transition coordination group.
>>>
>>>  
>>> Colleagues,
>>>
>>> When asked if I would let my name stand as a candidate here I said yes
>>> based on the assumption that there would be other candidates,
>>> followed by an open dialogue about what was desired as an outcome.
>>> I am dismayed by the turn of events and wish to stem the slide toward
>>> acrimony.
>>>
>>> In the interests of civility I withdraw my name as a candidate.
>>> Let the dialogue return to better ground.
>>>
>>> Sam Lanfranco
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>>> email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>   Skype: slanfranco
>>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>>> Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
>>>
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> *Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every classroom.
>>> Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence, June 27–29, in
>>> Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions on assessment, college
>>> and career readiness, STEM, and instructional practices. Featured
>>> presenters include Jay McTighe, Baruti Kafele, Richard Curwin and Carol
>>> Ann Tomlinson. Register NOW at **www.ascd.org/cte.
>>> <http://www.ascd.org/cte>*****
>>>
>>>
>>> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
>>>
>>> the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information
>>> that is
>>>
>>> confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient or
>>>
>>> have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
>>> distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please
>>> notify the
>>> sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this
>>> message and any
>>>
>>> attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or
>>> virus free.
>>>
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2