Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:08:19 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Avri
Please help me to understand
On 8/22/2016 12:43 PM, avri doria wrote:
> On 22-Aug-16 12:33, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> I do see some people want to be able to cast negative votes so to
>> speak and think NOTA is the way it could be done, but I don't agree
>> with that.
> That is the way it has been done until now.
>
> If you or the EC had wanted to change that, you should have discussed
> with it the membership instead of just doing it.
Is it not a question of what is in the charter or not and not a question
of what has been done. If it is not in the charter it has no effect on
the election outcome,
>
>> But we're presently discussing this in NCSG EC and if it decides
>> that new ballots need to be issued, we will do that.
> As long as the NCSG body politic agrees, that is.
How do we decide on what the NCSG body politics agrees? What is the
process?. Votes?. I want to avoid that those who scream loudest are seen
as the majority.
>
> At this point getting a sufficient group together to challenge an EC
> decision seems quite possible.
It is possible, but does it make sense to start a war every time someone
does not agree with us.? As far as I can see the NPOC position is
clearly expressed and stated.
> If it is not changed to the prior understanding for all elections in the
> NCSG to date, I will recommend a challenge.
Again, understandings can not replace a charter. We have to obey to some
minimum standards of following the rules.
Challenge away, this seems to be a case for the Ombudsman. Must be some
kind of record after just one day of voting.
I wish we could put our energies into more constructive issues.
Klaus
>
> avri
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> .
>
|
|
|