 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:56:58 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
As a mental exercise, what are the technical implications and risks of private/restricted TLDs other than the addition of EPP functionality for confirming when a registration is allowed?
avri
EPP: Extensible Provisioning Protocol RFC 3730 et al.
On 11 Mar 2013, at 13:38, McTim wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Carlos A. Afonso <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> And this is something that several people in the so-called "technical
>> community" find beyond their understanding
>
> I think this is incorrect. If a good case were made that a closed TLD
> restricted competion, I for one would be happy to agree with it.
>
> Just asserting the fact without evidence doesn't make it so.
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
>
|
|
|
