Hi,

While there are individual views  in the At-Large group discussing this,
a group i participate in, I do not believe there is an ALAC view on the
proposal yet.  From what I see, while some are still strongly committed
to the fully locked-in eternal internal undifferentiated IANA solution,
I think many are also looking on the current proposal as something they
maybe possibly could live with.

In a way, I expect that we will have some who can't live with this
solution from each of the two extremes.  For some it won't be internal
enough, for others it won't be independent enough.  The questions will
be, does it solve the biggest concerns of each camp and can enough live
with it?

avri

On 11-May-15 10:31, William Drake wrote:
> Hi
>
>> On May 11, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> The same can be said for names and is being said for names. Seun, let
>> me make something clear to you and all other ALAC people who have
>> tried to stop separability (interesting to know why but that is
>> another issue).
>
> I think a nice capsule summary of the differences between  ALAC (which
> is not to say At Large) and NCSG on these issues would be most helpful
> if someone could provide.
>
> Bill


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com