NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:14:57 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
I am marking up with sticky notes, as I do not have edit capability for 
PDFs on my laptop.  Hope this will be helpful, I will include all the 
relevant bits from my dissenting report as I understand that they have 
been omitted.  A google doc actually might be more helpful here, or some 
other kind of pad, if we can convert from the PDF to that format, as it 
is 62 pages and it is really important we get our points in as early as 
possible.
kind regards,
stephanie perrin

On 2015-06-17 18:02, Avri Doria wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am just reading this now.
>
> Let me know of anything in the next days.
>
> Just to make sure that people understand this is just a draft of the
> preliminary issues report.  that will come next - at which point we can
> submit formal comments.  At this point I will just be reviewing it as
> part of the process team.
>
> avri
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	[EWG-Process-WG] Draft Preliminary Issue Report
> Date: 	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:59:09 -0600
> From: 	Lisa Phifer <[log in to unmask]>
> To: 	[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Attached please find a DRAFT of a new Preliminary Issue Report for your
> review.
>
> As requested, staff has prepared this new draft to replace the original
> Preliminary Issue Report published in March 2013. This new draft:
>
> * incorporates by reference further work and correspondence on this
> topic over the past two years;
>
> * includes overviews of the EWG's outputs and Final Report (Section 3.6)
> and the EP-WG's Process Framework (Section 3.7);
>
> * frames the issue addressed by this PDP to reflect the 26 May 2015
> Board resolution (Section 3.5) and your framework adopted by that
> resolution; and
>
> * discusses that issue (Section 4) by identifying questions,
> available/needed inputs, and phased outputs, based on the EP-WG's
> Process Framework.
>
> As agreed, this DRAFT is now being sent to EP-WG members to preview the
> Preliminary Issue Report before it is posted for public comment, to
> ensure that your framework (2 April 2015) has been properly reflected.
>
> *Please raise any errors or omissions spotted during your preview of
> this DRAFT to the EP-WG list no later than 26 June.*
>
> Note that staff is also drafting a proposed PDP WG charter in parallel
> with your Issue Report preview. Any edits resulting from this EP-WG
> preview will be folded into the body of the Preliminary Issue Report and
> proposed charter.
>
> We expect to post the Preliminary Issue Report (including proposed
> charter) for public comment following your preview.
>
> In addition, after the public comment period, EP-WG members will have an
> opportunity to review public comments and recommend any needed changes
> to the framework.
>
> Staff (Marika and Margie) are also available in BA next week to discuss
> any questions or concerns.
>
> Best Regards,
> Lisa
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2