NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JFC Morfin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
JFC Morfin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:01:40 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
At 14:32 16/06/2011, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>Thx for your elaboration. I understand that you fear solidifying 
>ICANN further. I don't believe ICANN will ever be able to put itself 
>beyond the political reaches of a critical mass of users*, but i see 
>your point. I'll agree to disagree with regards to "harms" as i 
>believe enlarging the namespace does in principle more good than 
>harm. And ... i am curious, i admit.

Nicolas,

thank you for giving me the opportunity of having this exchange on 
the NCUC records. I have no personal point. I just want to make sure 
that all the people who try to influence the specific Internet 
namespace evolution have an equal access to the same understanding of 
the probable impact of their influence on the DNS use architecture. 
My target is that they are able to best proceed, whatever their 
position, since they will be held accountable for the development and 
deployment strategy they advocated and for its consequences.

Best
jfc

ATOM RSS1 RSS2