LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: new-gtld-committee-not-sure-how-to-handle-closed-generic-applications
From:	Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:14:24 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (22 lines)

That is what I beleive.

avri

On 6 Feb 2013, at 14:43, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> A quote from Karen Lentz (ICANN legal staff): "Under the current rules, there's nothing that would prevent the use of closed generics, which is focused on the issue of who can register a name."
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of William Drake
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:18 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] new-gtld-committee-not-sure-how-to-handle-
>> closed-generic-applications
>> 
>> surprise!
>> 
>> http://www.thedomains.com/2013/02/05/icann-new-gtld-committee-not-
>> sure-how-to-handle-closed-generic-applications/
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU