On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Alex Gakuru wrote:

> IN KENYA the Agikuyu say, “*Mundu utari nguku ona imwe ndagiriiruo ni
> gutuithia ciira wa nguku.*” Loosely translated, “A person who does not have
> even a single hen is not supposed to be elevated to adjudicate over matters
> poultry/disputes. If more contextually put, a parent is wiser if entrusts
> their child to the care of another parent than to an individual who does
> not have a child -- thus lack the full experience of having and raising a
> child. Is is not common knowledge that kids are such bundles of joy? ;-)
>
> Should the child under their watch falter or err, such an individual is
> likely to impulsively meter out terribly harsh punishments – unlike a
> fellow parent whom would otherwise hesitate before taking such drastic
> punitive actions.
>
> So much for cultural cross pollination in one day.
>
> enjoy,
>
> Alex

Thank you Alex for a most apt cultural reference / example.
This would make an excellent inclusion in a ncuc / ncsg public posting.

-ron

> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Michael Haffely <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> It concerns me that "I don't use email, some would call me a Luddite<http://mashable.com/2012/09/28/janet-napolitano-email/>"
>> Napalitano wants DHS to have "*greater access to internet and
>> cybersecurity information from the private sector*"  She doesn't have
>> anything to be concerned about or lose as she isn't a participant of/in
>> either the internet or the private sector.  She also said of a potential
>> "Digital 9/11" "*There are things we can and should be doing right now
>> that, if not prevent, would mitigate the extent of the damage"  *What
>> things?  What isn't being done?
>>
>> I also have doubts about the "Cyber Pearl Harbor that will occur and be as
>> bad as the September 11 attacks" meme that is thrown about. In my opinion
>> there has not been a Cyber Pearl Harbor threat model that isn't akin to a
>> movie plot, and the security community is, for the most part, very good
>> with sharing/alerting when a weird problem arises (CERT, SANS ISC, Mitre's
>> CVE, informal lines of communication, etc.).  I would encourage United
>> States citizens to contact your representatives and let them know that this
>> not the direction we should go, the proposed measures do little to
>> pro-actively protect the internet as giving DHS access to "internet and
>> cybersecurity information" will not protect, nor prevent an attack (and
>> what would they do with it?  Raid offices of companies with unpatched
>> equipment/servers?  Force them to upgrade? Require attestation of
>> compliance?).  Information of this type would probably only be useful to
>> attempt prosecution after an event.
>>
>> It's an incomplete thought but just my two cents.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Homeland Security's Napolitano invokes 9/11 to push for CISPA 2.0
>>>
>>> Link     https://rt.com/usa/news/napolitano-us-cyber-attack-761/
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>>
>>
>