Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:36:30 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; boundary="0-481902302-1138487790=:29296" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear all,
please find attached (plain text below) the draft statement four your
ultimate appraisal. For almost all parts, I integrated the edits by
Kathy into Milton's initial draft, and for a couple of paras (minors)
I've reverted to the the initial phrasing with a few changes based
both on Kathy's contribution and my own understanding. I left only
one comment in the attachment to have your views if you think it is
politically desirable, or efficient, to have a (discrete) reference
to an USG statement commenting the WGIG report.
I felt that Carlos concern to avoid "doing policy on case-by-case
basis or on individual opinions" is already taken into account in the
current statement. But what about the idea of "a temporary freeze on
any gTLD move (new/deleg/redeleg) until an independent, qualified
pluralist working group (...) prepares a detailed report with
recommendations."? As such, it may sound a bit discordant with what
we have in the report now, unless we change the tone and the emphasis
of our statement - so this is up to all of us to decide what is our
position. Beware, we only have two days including Sunday.
Regards,
Mawaki
|
|
|