agree completely.

avri

On 22-Sep-14 04:40, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> Which brings me to one technical issue I've been harping about
> to various people privately for some time: I see little point
> in maintaining three distinct member databases, when two
> are (required to be) subsets of the third. It would be much
> easier to maintain just NCSG member database and have
> constituency membership there as an attribute
> (of course still leaving it up to each constituency to
> decide who they accept as their members, they just would
> not need to maintain members' contact info &c separately).
> This would make for an easy workflow for the three ECs,
> one place for members to check their membership details, &c.