Hi,

In my minds ear, i hear you asking it and it sounds great.  
though you do take a breath.

avri

On 11 Nov 2013, at 10:43, Maria Farrell wrote:

> Avri hits all the topics I really hoped to see. I'd just add something along the lines of - given the difficulties NCSG has had having any positive impact on the policy process, and the findings in the Interconnect ATRT2 report that significant numbers of ppl in the GNSO have no faith in the process given the tendency of business interests to do end-runs around it, how can ICANN be leading the charge for the multistakeholder process externally? Shouldn't we get our own house in order first?
> 
> And good luck to anyone who tries asking that 'question' in one breath...
> 
> Maria
> 
> 
> On 10 November 2013 17:37, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> On 8 Nov 2013, at 20:27, Robin Gross wrote:
> 
> > All,
> >
> > I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the upcoming ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires.
> >
> > So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to the ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in BA.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Robin
> 
> 
> Some possible questions:
> 
> Q - details on the decisions they have made with regard to the NCSG case on TMCH+50 and the DIDP request
> 
> Q - general question on why they don't realize how bad their policies and actions with regad to reconsideration etc are and why they don't do anything about to fix it.
> 
> Q - what are they going to do with 100's of millions they are going to rake in from auctions.  Will the community be involved in deciding on what  Why not?
> 
> Q - why haven't we, the community, been included in these original plans for Brazil, with a follow-up on implications arising  from 11 Nov anouncemtent on the BrazilThngy (assuming the announcement came out)
> 
> avri
> 
>