NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:01:00 -0400
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
Hi,

On first read through, I would not change a thing.

avri


On 15-Sep-14 10:58, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I’ve tried to capture the essence of the different comments submitted
> by NCSG members including, Milton, Robin, Ed, Avri, Wisdom and my
> own. I don’t know if it does them all justice, but I’ve posted it
> here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISi_1cIaG3Hl4hzCM2VVc8sBsqGJQw6WR3vr6tptUcI/edit?usp=sharing
>
>  If I’ve missed any other comments submitted by NCSG members, please
> let me know.
> 
> The document is open for viewing and editing, but it’d be helpful if
> folks highlighted and commented on proposed changes so I can keep
> track of them.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
> On Sep 12, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I could try to consolidate the comments submitted by NCSG members
>> into one document and see if folks like it. I believe that they all
>> cover different and important aspects of why the proposed by-laws
>> amendment is really bad!!
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>> On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Thanks Avri again for submitting your contribution and sharing it
>>> with us. we had discussion within NCSG list about the proposal
>>> and maybe it is time to summarise a common position on that
>>> matter. we need volunteer(s) to collect the opinions shared in
>>> the list and draft a comment for review.  the deadline is 14th
>>> september but we have still the reply period we can use to submit
>>> our comment.
>>> 
>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amend-gac-advice-2014-08-15-en
>>>
>>>
>>> 
@Amr @Kathy you participated in the discussion is it possible to
volunteer for drafting a NCSG contribution?
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Rafik
>>> 
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Avri Doria
>>> <[log in to unmask]> Date: 2014-09-09 3:23 GMT+09:00 Subject:
>>> [NCSG-Discuss] Submitted individual comment on GAC advice
>>> amendment To: [log in to unmask]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I submitted an individual comment.
>>> 
>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/msg00017.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
avri
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ PC-NCSG mailing
>>> list [log in to unmask] 
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2