NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:00:45 -0400
Reply-To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
From:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
I agree


On 15/09/2014 11:01 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On first read through, I would not change a thing.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 15-Sep-14 10:58, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve tried to capture the essence of the different comments submitted
>> by NCSG members including, Milton, Robin, Ed, Avri, Wisdom and my
>> own. I don’t know if it does them all justice, but I’ve posted it
>> here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISi_1cIaG3Hl4hzCM2VVc8sBsqGJQw6WR3vr6tptUcI/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>   If I’ve missed any other comments submitted by NCSG members, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> The document is open for viewing and editing, but it’d be helpful if
>> folks highlighted and commented on proposed changes so I can keep
>> track of them.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>> On Sep 12, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I could try to consolidate the comments submitted by NCSG members
>>> into one document and see if folks like it. I believe that they all
>>> cover different and important aspects of why the proposed by-laws
>>> amendment is really bad!!
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Amr
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Avri again for submitting your contribution and sharing it
>>>> with us. we had discussion within NCSG list about the proposal
>>>> and maybe it is time to summarise a common position on that
>>>> matter. we need volunteer(s) to collect the opinions shared in
>>>> the list and draft a comment for review.  the deadline is 14th
>>>> september but we have still the reply period we can use to submit
>>>> our comment.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amend-gac-advice-2014-08-15-en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> @Amr @Kathy you participated in the discussion is it possible to
> volunteer for drafting a NCSG contribution?
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Avri Doria
>>>> <[log in to unmask]> Date: 2014-09-09 3:23 GMT+09:00 Subject:
>>>> [NCSG-Discuss] Submitted individual comment on GAC advice
>>>> amendment To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I submitted an individual comment.
>>>>
>>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/msg00017.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> avri
>>>> _______________________________________________ PC-NCSG mailing
>>>> list [log in to unmask]
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2