Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) |
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_694ED483-D2FF-4D58-BE4D-CB36CB26AC73";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:19:47 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
+1
Desiree
--
On 18 Mar 2016, at 09:05, Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
>
> --Wendy
>
> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>>
>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
>> share their views on the next hours.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Marília
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>>> Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>>> matter to us.
>>>
>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shane
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]
|
|
|