Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:29:52 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:02 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Avri:
> "..there is no multistakeholder model without governments,...."
>
> Wolfgang:
> I see four models
> 1. ICANN model (with governments in an advisory capacity)
> 2. WSIS model (with non-governmental stakeholders in a consultation process)
> 3. IGF model (all stakeholders on equal footing with no decision making capacity)
> 4. NetMundial model (all stakeholders on equal footing with limited decision making capacity)
>
> RIRs and IETF are special cases, open to everybody but too Special.
Too "specialised" you mean?
I see them as the definitive "Best Practices".
Regards,
McTim
>
> Interesting experiences emerge in some countries at the national Level.
>
> Lets wait and see what Fadis "many little ICANNs" will produce.
>
> We are still in an early phase. There is no "BEST practice", but there is a growing number of "good practices".
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
|
|
|