LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:35:19 +0300
Content-Disposition:	inline
Reply-To:	Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: NPOC Comment Re: Member Admission Process and Member Databases
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:	Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (16 lines)

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 04:07:07PM -0400, Sam Lanfranco ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> One overarching issue has to do with how much ICANN support and
> involvement does NCSG want. Is it is an issue of trust, of
> efficiency, or of optics that suggests that little be hosted on
> ICANN servers?

Yes. Historically trust (and "optics" as you put it) has been a big
factor there, but efficiency is also relevant, in particular that
ICANN tends to move somewhat slowly and their staff, while
compenetent, doesn't always understand our needs or don't have the
resources to provide the flexibility we'd like.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU