Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:23:32 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 18 Apr 2012, at 16:15, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And some of us have reflexive protective instinct that seems to indicate no cIr manager can do wrong.
cIr manager == critical Interent resource manager ; i.e. ICANN, the RIRs and their ilk.
>
> At this point there most certainly is something to be seen here. This was not a simple glitch that was fixed in a day. This is a major event that is still ongoing with no end in sight. I do not beleive in judging before the whole story is reveled, but do insist that the whole story be revealed.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2012, at 16:02, McTim wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do we actually know this?
>>
>> of course not, this list just has to reflexively kick ICANN in the
>> 'nads when they are already on the ground....for me this whole TAS
>> thing is mountain out of a molehill....nothing to see folks, kindly
>> move along.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> McTim
>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
>> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
>>
>
|
|
|