NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:13:57 +0200
Reply-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: ICANN Paranoia
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Considering the NSA and PRISM stuff and that they are into Microsoft, Google, Apple, Facebook, etc - shouldn't we assume that ICANN has been compromised? Considering everything else they are into how can they not be into ICANN?
> 
> Having said that - what does that mean to our trip?

Maybe that we should have all worried less about having our computers compromised at the Beijing meeting?  Or, worried more broadly...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2