NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date:
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:28:36 +0000
Reply-To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
/s/NCUC/NCSG apologies.



=jg









On 20/04/2016, 17:26, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of James Gannon" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:



>Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related campaign.

>

>Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to endorse?

>

>

>

>

>On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:

>

>>Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be 

>>part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.

>>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2