How do either of the two candidates view the question of an independent review system, or more broadly the role of a "judicial branch"  in ICANN's governance structure? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:33 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Questions & Concerns for our
> Representatives on the Accountability & Transparency Review Team (ATRT2)
> 
> On 21 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Robin Gross wrote:
> 
> > Therefore now have a 24-hour period to ask the two NCSG candidates
> questions and to provide them with initial feedback about desired
> outcomes for the ATRT (using this list beginning now).
> >
> 
> 
> Thanks Robin, for opening this topic.
> 
> I think that the AOC reviews are among the most important work we do
> outside of Policy recommendations.  And I think that the ATRT - being
> responsible for reviewing, and then recommending  improvements on, the
> accountability and transparency of ICANN is central to any evolution we
> might someday see ICANN and its ability to become a free standing
> dynamic organization.
> 
> Even if this list does not have any specific questions for the two of us
> who have asked for the NCSG endorsement, I would really like to hear
> about issues that are currently on people's minds about the specific
> issues that need to be covered by the upcoming review.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> avri
> 
> Ps: Dan, I remember that I owe you an answer on Dynamic Organizational
> Architectures which includes the issue of accountability.  While I am
> still working on that theoretical answer, in a practical sense, I think
> that accountable and transparent Accountability and Transparency
> Reviews, are a key ingredient.