NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:47:30 +0100
Reply-To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: [council] Nominating Committee Draft Input
From:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
On Dec 17, 2014, at 8:21 PM, Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> True, then we'd have a little (not much) to bargain with.
> 
> Perhaps we should support the letter ;)

Hahaha!! That’s precisely what I’m trying to avoid!! But I have initiated this discussion with the knowledge that I am in a minority opinion on this, and will grudgingly (just this once :)) respect the wishes of others.

Thanks again.

Amr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2