hi,


On 01-Mar-14 22:04, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> Good suggestion, thanks.  sure are lots of moving parts to this whole
> machine…. SP

Yep.  But fortunately we have a player in most of the matches.
what we need to do is remain coordinated and work as a team building on 
each others little successes and working around each of our little failures.

Actually at this point I think all of the Non-governmentals need to 
coordinate.  /1net and ccWGIg are a start, as pathetic as they might 
seem at times.

avri



On Mar 1, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 01-Mar-14 17:55, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> Interesting.  Is it likely we will see that this time around as
>>> well? Got any suggestions as to how I distance myself from this
>>> kind of policy laundering?  Given the lack of clarity about the
>>> high level multistakeholder committee, I am already suspecting
>>> something like this will be passed in front of us for
>>> endorsement, likely at the meeting because we dont appear to have
>>> a prior role.  Makes getting alternative text in by march 8 all
>>> the more important, if there is no faith in the process....
>>> Stephanie
>>
>> You have no agreed language that binds.  WGEC does because we are a
>> UN process, and they have rules about the sanctity of agreed
>> language, even when that langauge is just a declaration and not a
>> treaty.
>>
>> Perhaps you can build on the idea that WGEC is considering a
>> recommendation that there be follow discussions among all
>> stakeholders on stakeholder R&R and how could you do any less.  And
>> that therefore they should also endorse that in perhaps even
>> stronger terms.
>>
>> If we can into our May meeting with y'allhaving strengthened our
>> language that would be cool.  And helpful.  If you weaken it or
>> ignore that will cause pain.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> avri
>
>
>