 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:18:59 +0300 |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 07:19:06AM +0300, Avri Doria ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bent out of shape because we are not following our processes?
> What an idea? Almost worthy of a reconsideration request.
>
> It was sent in NCSG's name. Yet there was no process to do so.
>
> I know it is what you and handful of others want, but we have
> Chartered processes by which we make decisions and no decision
> process, as far as I can tell, was followed.
I must support Avri here on general principles, even though
I haven't been exactly active here recently nor do I have
anything to say about this reconsideration request as such.
I would very much like to see ncsg act at least a bit more formally,
in particular to have and follow well-documented processes in its
decision-making.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
|
|
|
