NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2015 00:59:51 +0000
Reply-To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: [Poll] Topics for discussion: NCSG - ICANN Board meeting Tuesday 10th February
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
> -----Original Message-----
> I cannot stress enough
> how bad an idea it is I believe it is to negotiate a definition for public interest
> within the ICANN context. I can see this becoming very problematic in gTLD
> policy development and the resultant contractual requirements of registries
> and registrars.

This means you are exactly the right person for the job!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2