Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:16:31 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would like to talk with them about work flow. ICANN has hired 100
policy staffers in the last year and has an enormous new capability for
work flow, but we do not. There is no way to keep up with what is "in
the queue" and "coming down the pike."
I would expressly invite David Olive (as lead of ICANN's Policy
Development Support Team) to be part of this discussion as well. How do
we make the work load reasonable if we want the volunteer,
multistakeholder model to continue? Is it based on ICANN capacity or
stakeholder capacity?
Best,
Kathy
On 2/26/2016 6:10 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to meet the Board,
> talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
>
> The Board would, however, like to know in advance what we're going
> to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
>
> If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with the Board in
> Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel free to post
> to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
>
> Thank you,
>
|
|
|