NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Mon, 11 May 2015 14:39:29 -0400
Reply-To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 11/05/2015 10:16 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> {extract}
>
> ...we don't have the powers yet that CCWG is working on, but the
> point of those changes is that it should already be the case that they
> should be listening to the SOAC community for their understanding of
> ICANN's fiduciary responsibilities and of what is best for the Internet.
>
> avri
>
Having tangled with the issue of ICANN's fiduciary responsibility, I 
would like to hear what the board thinks is, and is not, its fiduciary 
responsibility....and to whom?
For one, in my humble opinion, I think there are issues around the gTLD 
domain name auctions, depending on what ICANN's fiduciary responsibility 
is...and to whom?

Sam L.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2