Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:34:42 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jeremy,
If you can share the text with me I think I could also submit that
comment on behalf of Article19, if you're fine with that (or we could
do it jointly). Am currently completely swamped with work in CCWP-HR
and CCWG WP4.
Best,
Niels
On 10/06/2015 11:10 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On 5/10/2015 8:04 pm, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> As indicated earlier today, the comments period is now open for
>> the WHOIS conflicts with law procedures initial report. I would
>> note that the Appendices, which contain the dissenting views, are
>> not included in the report, they are listed under Section IV
>> Additional Information, so if you are reading the report please
>> make sure to read the appendices. My own Appendix 4 had a
>> missing sentence fragment on page 1, which is fixed in the posted
>> version. Stephanie Perrin
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/iag-whois-conflicts-privacy-201
5-10-05-en
>
>>
>
> Thanks Stephanie, I'm arranging for EFF to file a brief comment in
> support of the dissenting views.
>
- --
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWFGiiAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpdN0IAJ3pZkO5sPZ5F1KMsnBeEr5+
HiQNQ+ZszIq1e9aRNmxvIwUToR5a5t91XYxXsQxZykKgWdMSkkoErwBbwKaXvlEY
lRzNNRtYiylKXUUjtnKNZKL7wNl65kpz14dFisorEoSRGx5ubj/79yeYi9ojym2h
Z9/HHuZv1nSgkzjhYwLdJd7Hw1hYJ30gmETdNRtDFfw8IFCwIwNfwsceKs/Dg+oT
bk+d3bSHK9hPRznvWWl1rSF5LOrNKy+oCkvuup/BbUA9AmAH4vRn3nKieEwcnFAe
sMXQEH6lb2iF1lsJBDbPkMlE78u9UwIrujifKBH3AW5tfsFI9ODOgwXPkhvqXUA=
=9Iiv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|