Do you mean you would like to hear names of registrars that are not
offering DNSSEC ? Am afraid it is the majority of the SME registrars /
hosting providers.

Cheers,

Niels

On 05/26/2016 11:57 AM, James Gannon wrote:
> Have you got any specific examples?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 26/05/2016, 10:50, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Niels ten Oever" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been talking to several registrars (especially smaller ones that
>> provide a lot of support to NGOs), that do not provide DNSSEC yet as
>> part of their service.
>>
>> The story that I keep on hearing is that even the most experienced
>> engineers have issues with understanding the configuration of the KSK
>> and Zone signing keys and the key rollover, inconsistencies in
>> documentation and therefore lack of adoption, because in case of a
>> mistake this might seriously impact the production environment.
>>
>> I think the adoption of DNSSEC is an issue we should care about because
>> it has the potential to radically increase trust in the DNS system.
>>
>> Is this an issue you all recognize, and do you know how / if ICANN makes
>> (or can make) this easier?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9