Amr:

I have looked over the comments and would make some suggestions. I would edit it directly but I am not authorized on this doc so I have inserted some comments

________________________________________
From: NCSG-Discuss [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Amr Elsadr [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study

Thanks McTim,

I’ve replaced “more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted” with “more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted” in the last paragraph. I hope that’s what you were referring to.

Thanks again.

Amr

On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy
>> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November
>> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would
>> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are
>> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any
>> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
>>
>> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted"
>
> I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes:
>
> "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted"
>
>
> Then it is fine by me.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel