Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:22:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
As I said, the CWG has defined the notion of IANA accountability as
being in scope for the CWG. I think that is a stronger alternative as
no matter what process ICANN picks to resolve its accountability
problems, the CWG can make its own determinations on IANA accountability.
And since this is ICANN, many of the same people will be on both, or
will cooordinate through their SOAC and SG/Cs.
But accepting, as I always must when Milton indicates something might be
wrong with my understanding, that I might be wrong, I have passed the
thread on to the CWG charter drafting team. I also recommend that the
other NCSG council members bring up these concerns in the council
discussion we will have.
avri
On 14-Aug-14 09:49, Avri Doria wrote:
> On 14-Aug-14 09:40, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> I don't understand why Avri is not seeing this and offering apologias
>> for the oversight in the CWG charter.
>
> Hey, I am in the room.
>
> Because i disagree and think what we have is stronger.
>
> avri
>
>
|
|
|