All are clearly discussion worthy,
I would be in favor of 7, 9 and 12 as the top three topics as they go to the essence of the much of the debates in ICANN.
Lori S. Schulman · General Counsel
1703 North Beauregard Street
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
P 703-575-5678 · [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Preparation for ICANN LA meeting starting / LA HIGH-INTEREST TOPIC SESSION
Hi,
Just sent this to NCUC
-------- Original Message --------
To: [log in to unmask]
My top three
Human Rights considerations at ICANN
Discussion on outcomes to date from the ATRT2 report
What does multistakeholder bottom-up process mean at ICANN (this may be related to one there on essence of ICANN.)
avri
On 10-Sep-14 10:02, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> as you may know already, there were several topic proposed for the
> high-interest topic session which should be held on the monday of
> ICANN meeting in LA.
> there is list below of several topics and we should select top 3 among
> them .
> please share you thoughts and choose 3 topics that should be discussed
> in that session.
> we need to get our list by next monday so I can sent it Tuesday.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Olive <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2014-09-10 16:01 GMT+09:00
> Subject: LA HIGH-INTEREST TOPIC SESSION
> To:
>
>
> Dear Community Leaders:
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for the feedback on potential High Interest
> Topics for your Monday session at the ICANN Public Meeting in Los
> Angeles. Based on all your feedback, we’ve now got a list of 12 potential topics.
>
>
>
> Given time constraints and many different panel participants, you will
> all recall that for the Buenos Aires meeting we focused on just two
> primary topics. I think, if possible, that should be your target
> again this time for the Los Angeles session.
>
>
>
> Between now and early next week, please share with me your ”top three”
> topics from the list below. I will compile the results and hope that
> the feedback will narrow the topic choice to just a few topics that we
> can then confirm on next week’s CEO call with Fadi.
>
>
>
> Here’s the list we have to work from based on all your input:
>
>
>
> · *1. NetMundial Initiative and Hand-off*
>
> · *2. Affirmation Review of gTLD Expansion*
>
> · *3. Planning for Next Round of New gTLDs*
>
> · *4. NomCom Improvements*
>
> · *5. Universal acceptance of new gTLDs* (Two separate suggestions)
>
> · *6. Disposition of Excess New gTLD Fees and Auction Proceeds.*
>
> · *7. Integration of the GAC into the GNSO policy process* (also see
> GNSO Council suggestion - number 11 below)
>
>
>
> GNSO Council collected topics submitted by Jonathan:
>
>
>
> • *8. Trust In ICANN* – A perception exists (real or imagined) that
> big decisions are made that exclude or disregard community input.
> What causes for mistrust can be eliminated, and how? How do we see
> ICANN accountability as functional and effective? How should
> government influence work, where are its limits? Perhaps instead of
> focusing on one narrow topic we should initiate a series of bottom-up
> debates on how the community would like to see ICANN develop in the next years -- an “Agenda 2020” if you will.
>
> • *9. Legitimacy in Internet governance* – The Internet today
> resembles a country where 1% of the population governs 99% of the
> population, and most don't even know that the 1% exists! Legitimate
> democratic governance depends on the awareness and participation of
> the populous. Legitimacy in Internet governance requires greater
> awareness and participation of stakeholders. Civil society is the most
> disenfranchised part of the whole processes, and it has the most to loose.
>
> • *10. Future of the Internet* – Is ICANN too focused on a circa 2000
> Internet model, where human-driven Internet action and URLs dominated.
> That is not true today, and will bring some even more profound changes
> in the future. Two examples include machine to machine traffic and
> “in application” services. How can ICANN address these issues?
>
> • *11. Future role of the GAC *- There is a sliver of "public policy"
> in everything at ICANN, and the nature of government participation
> makes governments reluctant to accept anything short of immediate and
> total adoption of their advice. Where do we go from here? Can the
> relevance of the SO/ACs be preserved, or is every topic or material
> issue destined to become a GAC/Board negotiation? What limitations or
> backstops can check government influence, while still allowing for
> full consideration of their advice?
>
> • *12. What is the essence of ICANN?*" Is ICANN the corporation, is
> ICANN the community, or is it both? (this could capture both the trust
> and future role of the GAC topics.
>
>
>
> For your information, it seems that a few of the suggested topics
> listed above will already be covered by other sessions that are in the
> planning stages including a session on Universal acceptance, GAC-GNSO
> in the joint meeting, Netmundial in a separate update, a new gTLD
> session or two and a Board discussion on the Review of the Nominating Committee.
>
>
>
> With that in mind, please provide your feedback to this list by close
> of business next Tuesday and I will consolidate/compile the feedback.
> Its sufficient to send me a note listing BY NUMBER the three topics
> that are your top choices.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to talking with you all next week.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> David
>
Learn the secrets to great leadership practices at the ASCD Conference on Educational Leadership, October 31–November 2, 2014 in Orlando, Florida. Featured presenters include Todd Whitaker, Baruti Kafele, Robyn Jackson, and Carol Ann Tomlinson. Register NOW at www.ascd.org/cel.<http://www.ascd.org/cel>
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is
confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or
have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any
attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free.
|
