For quite some time now, IDNs have been closely followed by the ALAC.
I suggest that the NCSG examine the possibility of a joint statement with the ALAC. This might have a greater impact.
Best regards,
Jean-Jacques.








----- Mail original -----
De: "Rafik Dammak" <[log in to unmask]>
À: [log in to unmask]
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Janvier 2015 02:33:25
Objet: Re: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines


Hi Avri, 


thanks for sharing, I guess that is something which may interest those having interest in IDNs from technical perspective and want to see the policy impact. a good starter. 


Best, 




Rafik 


2015-01-07 3:22 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria < [log in to unmask] > : 




anyone? anything? 

avri 



-------- Forwarded Message -------- 
Subject: 	[council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines 
Date: 	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 09:33:09 -0000 
From: 	Jonathan Robinson <[log in to unmask]> 
Reply-To: 	[log in to unmask] 
Organization: 	Afilias 
To: 	[log in to unmask] 
CC: 	[log in to unmask] , Ching Chiao <[log in to unmask]> , Ram Mohan <[log in to unmask]> 




Councillors, 



A reminder that this letter (re-attached) seeks initial input by 30 January 2014. 



Is anyone willing to pick this up and assist please? 



Thank-you. 





Jonathan 





From: Jonathan Robinson [ mailto:[log in to unmask] ] 
Sent: 08 December 2014 10:10 
To: [log in to unmask] GNSO ( [log in to unmask] ) 
Subject: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines 



All, 



Please see attached and note that the request seeks some initial input by 30 January 2015. 



Thanks. 





Jonathan 





From: Akram Atallah [ mailto:[log in to unmask] ] 
Sent: 04 December 2014 00:24 
To: [log in to unmask] ; Jonathan Robinson 
Cc: Mary Wong; Cyrus Namazi; Sarmad Hussain; [log in to unmask] ; Marika Konings 
Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines 







Dear Jonathan, 



In the ICANN 50 meeting, the GNSO council and members met with the Board Variant Working Group (BV-WG) and suggested to update the IDN Implementation Guidelines, the last revision was in 2011. 



Based on follow up discussions, during the ICANN 51 meeting the BV-WG directed the staff to reach out to the GNSO and ccNSO to collect an initial list of issues which should be addressed if this update is undertaken. This request is outlined in the attached letter. 



Thank you for your support in this matter. 









-- 


Best, 


Akram 


_______________________________________________ 
PC-NCSG mailing list 
[log in to unmask] 
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg