NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:05:32 -0400
Reply-To:
Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
From:
Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
I support endorsing the IAB comment.

--Wendy

On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
> 
> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
> share their views on the next hours.
> 
> Thanks!
> MarĂ­lia
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> 
>> All,
>>
>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>> Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>> matter to us.
>>
>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Shane
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2