Thanks so much Avri, makes this more useable by far!
cheers Stephanie

On 2015-06-20 10:44, Avri Doria wrote:
> hi,
>
> as requested:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GGHDeu4GptK-QUo7qdBBiVXMzHSEZrR1doEbltmsddU/edit?usp=sharing
>
> the conversion put the draft imprint in foreground so they need to be
> deleted on any page you want to comment.
>
> i have deleted some of the.
>
> avri
>
> On 20-Jun-15 10:14, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> I am marking up with sticky notes, as I do not have edit capability
>> for PDFs on my laptop.  Hope this will be helpful, I will include all
>> the relevant bits from my dissenting report as I understand that they
>> have been omitted.  A google doc actually might be more helpful here,
>> or some other kind of pad, if we can convert from the PDF to that
>> format, as it is 62 pages and it is really important we get our points
>> in as early as possible.
>> kind regards,
>> stephanie perrin
>>
>> On 2015-06-17 18:02, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I am just reading this now.
>>>
>>> Let me know of anything in the next days.
>>>
>>> Just to make sure that people understand this is just a draft of the
>>> preliminary issues report.  that will come next - at which point we can
>>> submit formal comments.  At this point I will just be reviewing it as
>>> part of the process team.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject:     [EWG-Process-WG] Draft Preliminary Issue Report
>>> Date:     Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:59:09 -0600
>>> From:     Lisa Phifer <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To:     [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Attached please find a DRAFT of a new Preliminary Issue Report for your
>>> review.
>>>
>>> As requested, staff has prepared this new draft to replace the original
>>> Preliminary Issue Report published in March 2013. This new draft:
>>>
>>> * incorporates by reference further work and correspondence on this
>>> topic over the past two years;
>>>
>>> * includes overviews of the EWG's outputs and Final Report (Section 3.6)
>>> and the EP-WG's Process Framework (Section 3.7);
>>>
>>> * frames the issue addressed by this PDP to reflect the 26 May 2015
>>> Board resolution (Section 3.5) and your framework adopted by that
>>> resolution; and
>>>
>>> * discusses that issue (Section 4) by identifying questions,
>>> available/needed inputs, and phased outputs, based on the EP-WG's
>>> Process Framework.
>>>
>>> As agreed, this DRAFT is now being sent to EP-WG members to preview the
>>> Preliminary Issue Report before it is posted for public comment, to
>>> ensure that your framework (2 April 2015) has been properly reflected.
>>>
>>> *Please raise any errors or omissions spotted during your preview of
>>> this DRAFT to the EP-WG list no later than 26 June.*
>>>
>>> Note that staff is also drafting a proposed PDP WG charter in parallel
>>> with your Issue Report preview. Any edits resulting from this EP-WG
>>> preview will be folded into the body of the Preliminary Issue Report and
>>> proposed charter.
>>>
>>> We expect to post the Preliminary Issue Report (including proposed
>>> charter) for public comment following your preview.
>>>
>>> In addition, after the public comment period, EP-WG members will have an
>>> opportunity to review public comments and recommend any needed changes
>>> to the framework.
>>>
>>> Staff (Marika and Margie) are also available in BA next week to discuss
>>> any questions or concerns.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus