NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:39:52 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Just for the record the EC has not yet shared its consensus communications on the process and ballot information.



-james









On 25/08/2016, 18:27, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Neal McBurnett" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:



>But I think we should to stick to the consensus EC procedural decisions that have been communicated.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2