Hi,

As discussed on today’s monthly policy call, I’ve attached the amendments that Farzaneh Badii, Matthew Shears, Edward Morris and I have recommended. It is our hope that, through these very lightweight changes, the Council will vote on a factually correct motion that does not advocate one side over another. It is also important to point out that regardless of the language of the motion, we very much support the DT recommendations, and hope the GNSO Council will accept them.

For context on this, please see agenda item 4 on the GNSO Council’s meeting agenda (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+1+December+2016).

I’d be happy to answer any questions on this.

Thanks.

Amr