Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:35:02 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
+ 1 Avri. Our learnings from the CCWG are a case in point.
Lets use this opportunity to benefit of our community.
On 24/10/2016 20:30, avri doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Studies show the online cooperative work, works best when there s
> occasional F2F. But we have lots of other F2F opportunities, especially
> for the leaders sent to the intercessional. So it is not necessary in
> this case.
>
> On the other hand, if there is a meeting, I do not see the win for NCSG
> in boycotting the meeting. I think that is a dangerous tactic.
> Boycotting works, but only in extreme cases and very rarely - do it more
> then once and people get used to you being absent. So if we are going
> to include boycott as a tactic, i think we should pick our occasion
> carefully and not just because we don't feel like traveling to somewhere
> or other.
>
> Finally, on the issue about the GNSO being just about policy: I think it
> is also about our self organization, our practices, our interactions
> with the rest of ICANN, and our participation in the Enhanced Community.
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
|
|