 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:59:03 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:19 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Jurisdiction will be in work stream 2.
>
> <suppressed giggle>
>
> In other words, it will be a day later and a few dollars shorter. No, once we set up an elaborate new accountability scheme based on California law in WS1, it will not be changeable on any time frame relevant to our life times.
>
Not to mention a ton of contracts that would have to be redone etc. The legal stuff would be mind boggling. But it’d still be worth going through the process and doing a systematic cost/benefit assessment of the options, particularly given the acute interest in some quarters, including the GAC chair.
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 8:22 PM, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> this is the first time I've seen a work stream 3 mentioned.
Give it time… :-(
Cheers
Bill
|
|
|
