NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:35:25 +0000
Reply-To:
"Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: A Response To the CCWG question
From:
"Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
> -----Original Message-----
> The only thing I would add is that one of the prices we pay for 'voting our
> consciences' in council and elsewhere is sometimes being challenged to
> explain ourselves.
> 
> Milton challenged, and Ed responded.
> 

+1. That's the spirit! My concern is not Ed, this isn't about Ed, it's about the accountability of our representatives on the Council to our Stakeholder Group. 

--MM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2