NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:26:29 +0000
Reply-To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related campaign.



Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to endorse?









On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:



>Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be 

>part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2